Meadvin v. Buckley-Southland Oil Co.
451 N.E.2d 491, 59 N.Y.2d 822, 464 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3153
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review reversed, with costs, and the order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 907, 908).
[824]*824Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to affirm for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 907). Taking no part: Judge Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meadvin v. Buckley-Southland Oil Co., 451 N.E.2d 491, 59 N.Y.2d 822, 464 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3153 (N.Y. 1983).
451 N.E.2d 491 (Meadvin v. Buckley-Southland Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental Insurance
624 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Sutton Hill Associates v. Landes
775 F. Supp. 682 (S.D. New York, 1991)
Sandoro v. Harlem-Genesee Market & Nursery, Inc.
105 A.D.2d 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)