Meads v. Wandell

Saratoga Chancery Court

Meads v. Wandell

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14

DecidedApril 2, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14 (Meads v. Wandell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meads v. Wandell, 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

Decided that the grant of a fraehise to keep a ferry between two places does not necessarily exclude the right of the state, or those in whom the right of granting such a franchise is vested, from granting a similar right to others between different points ; unless there is something exclusive in the terms of the first grant.

That an injunction will not bo granted to prevent a party from using a franchise which he claims as belonging to him, [15]*15until the complainant has established his exclusive right thereto, by a suit at law, or otherwise.

Injunction dissolved; costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decided that the grant of a fraehise to keep a ferry between two places does not necessarily exclude the right of the state, or those in whom the right of granting such a franchise is vested, from granting a similar right to others between different points ; unless there is something exclusive in the terms of the first grant.

That an injunction will not bo granted to prevent a party from using a franchise which he claims as belonging to him, [15]*15until the complainant has established his exclusive right thereto, by a suit at law, or otherwise.

Injunction dissolved; costs to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meads-v-wandell-nychanctsara-1844.