Meads v. Wandell

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14
Saratoga Chancery Court·Decided April 2, 1844·Published

Opinion

Decided that the grant of a fraehise to keep a ferry between two places does not necessarily exclude the right of the state, or those in whom the right of granting such a franchise is vested, from granting a similar right to others between different points ; unless there is something exclusive in the terms of the first grant.

That an injunction will not bo granted to prevent a party from using a franchise which he claims as belonging to him, [15]*15until the complainant has established his exclusive right thereto, by a suit at law, or otherwise.

Injunction dissolved; costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meads v. Wandell, 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14 (Meads v. Wandell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.