Meadows v. Smith

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Meadows v. Smith

598 So. 2d 912, 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 124, 1992 WL 42863

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Meadows v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 313 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 6, 1992·No. 2900239·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part, reversed in part, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of February 7, 1992, this case is now affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for the trial court to make an assessment of damages in accordance with the supreme court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THIGPEN and RUSSELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part, reversed in part, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of February 7, 1992, this case is now affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for the trial court to make an assessment of damages in accordance with the supreme court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THIGPEN and RUSSELL, JJ., concur.

Meadows v. Smith, 598 So. 2d 912, 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 124, 1992 WL 42863 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

598 So. 2d 912 (Meadows v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.