Meadows v. Raynor

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 16, 2005
• Docket: 04-7880
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7880

ALAN L. MEADOWS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT RAYNOR; MR. HARRIS, Unit Manager; HINNIAN, Sgt.; HOLLINGSWORTH, Sgt.; MOYLE, C/O,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-03-506-BO)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan L. Meadows, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Alan L. Meadows appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Meadows v. Raynor, No. CA-03-506-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -