Meadows v. Perdrix Machinery & Sales Co.

141 S.E.2d 488, 264 N.C. 372, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1194
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 28, 1965
StatusPublished

This text of 141 S.E.2d 488 (Meadows v. Perdrix Machinery & Sales Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meadows v. Perdrix Machinery & Sales Co., 141 S.E.2d 488, 264 N.C. 372, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1194 (N.C. 1965).

Opinion

Peb Curiam.

An examination of the record reveals no error which would warrant a new trial. This case involved only issues of fact. It was fairly submitted to the jury, which seems to have attempted to do equity. If, as defendant stressfully contends,, incompetent evidence was admitted over its objection, the exception taken was worthless because the same testimony had been theretofore or was thereafter given by the witness in other parts of his examination without objection. Dunes Club v. Insurance Co., 259 N.C. 293, 130 S.E. 2d 625.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunes Club, Inc. v. CHEROKEE INSURANCE COMPANY
130 S.E.2d 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Dunes Club, Inc. v. Cherokee Insurance
130 S.E.2d 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 S.E.2d 488, 264 N.C. 372, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadows-v-perdrix-machinery-sales-co-nc-1965.