Meadows v. Perdrix Machinery & Sales Co.

141 S.E.2d 488, 264 N.C. 372, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1194
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 28, 1965·Published

Opinion

Peb Curiam.

An examination of the record reveals no error which would warrant a new trial. This case involved only issues of fact. It was fairly submitted to the jury, which seems to have attempted to do equity. If, as defendant stressfully contends,, incompetent evidence was admitted over its objection, the exception taken was worthless because the same testimony had been theretofore or was thereafter given by the witness in other parts of his examination without objection. Dunes Club v. Insurance Co., 259 N.C. 293, 130 S.E. 2d 625.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meadows v. Perdrix Machinery & Sales Co., 141 S.E.2d 488, 264 N.C. 372, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1194 (N.C. 1965).

141 S.E.2d 488 (Meadows v. Perdrix Machinery & Sales Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunes Club, Inc. v. CHEROKEE INSURANCE COMPANY
130 S.E.2d 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Dunes Club, Inc. v. Cherokee Insurance
130 S.E.2d 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)