Meadows v. . Marsh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Meadows v. . Marsh

31 S.E. 476, 123 N.C. 189, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 45

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 22, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 S.E. 476 (Meadows v. . Marsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meadows v. . Marsh, 31 S.E. 476, 123 N.C. 189, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 45 (N.C. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Faircloth, C. J.:

This is a controversy without action under The Code. The facts need not be stated except to say that A. Crews and wife made several deeds of trust to secure creditors, and the second trustee sold a part of the property and realized more than enough to pay the debt secured to him, and he asks the Court to give him directions. Crews and wife are not parties to this proceeding. The proceeding is remanded to the end that the trustors and other interested persons may be made parties and allowed to plead or answer.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faircloth, C. J.:

This is a controversy without action under The Code. The facts need not be stated except to say that A. Crews and wife made several deeds of trust to secure creditors, and the second trustee sold a part of the property and realized more than enough to pay the debt secured to him, and he asks the Court to give him directions. Crews and wife are not parties to this proceeding. The proceeding is remanded to the end that the trustors and other interested persons may be made parties and allowed to plead or answer.

Remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 S.E. 476, 123 N.C. 189, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadows-v-marsh-nc-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack