Meadows v. . Mann

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Meadows v. . Mann

114 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 630, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 149

DecidedNovember 8, 1922

StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 927 (Meadows v. . Mann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meadows v. . Mann, 114 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 630, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 149 (N.C. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract in the sale of seed oats.

Upon denial of liability and issues joined, there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, from which the defendant appealed, assigning errors. The controversy, on trial, narrowed itself principally to the questions of fact, which have been settled by the verdict. After a careful investigation of the record, we have found no ruling or action on the part of the learned judge which would seem to justify a reversal or an order for a new trial. The judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract in the sale of seed oats.

Upon denial of liability and issues joined, there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, from which the defendant appealed, assigning errors. The controversy, on trial, narrowed itself principally to the questions of fact, which have been settled by the verdict. After a careful investigation of the record, we have found no ruling or action on the part of the learned judge which would seem to justify a reversal or an order for a new trial. The judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 630, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadows-v-mann-nc-1922.