Meadows v. Kennett
This text of 53 F.3d 328 (Meadows v. Kennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
53 F.3d 328
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Willard R. MEADOWS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
John H. KENNETT, Jr., Attorney; Mosby G. Perrow, III,
Judge; Roscoe Bolan Stephenson, Jr., Justice;
Henry H. Whiting, Justice; Leroy
Roundtree Hassell, Justice,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-2555.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 10, 1995.
Willard R. Meadows, Appellant Pro Se. John H. Kennett, Jr., Roanoke, VA; Barbara J. Gaden, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Meadows v. Kennett, No. CA-94-100-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F.3d 328, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16733, 1995 WL 272600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadows-v-kennett-ca4-1995.