Meadows v. Giardino
This text of 285 A.D. 1187 (Meadows v. Giardino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a stockholder’s action, order denying motion for examination before trial of Carl A. Espaeh, formerly an attorney for all of the parties, as a witness, with a direction to him to produce all relevant books and papers on such examination, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The examination will proceed on five days’ notice at a time and place to be stated in the order. The undisputed circumstances constitute a sufficient compliance with section 288 of the Civil Practice Act to warrant the granting of the application. Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 1187, 141 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadows-v-giardino-nyappdiv-1955.