Meadows, Hunter v. Brown Bros., Inc.

CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMay 4, 2026
Docket2025-10-7709
StatusPublished

This text of Meadows, Hunter v. Brown Bros., Inc. (Meadows, Hunter v. Brown Bros., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meadows, Hunter v. Brown Bros., Inc., (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

FILED May 04, 2026 10:19 AM(ET) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT CHATTANOOGA

Hunter Meadows, Docket No. 2025-10-7709 Employee, v. Brown Bros., Inc., State File No. 60380-2025 Employer, And Business First Insurance Company, Judge Audrey Headrick Carrier.

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER (Decision on the Record)

Mr. Meadows requested an order requiring Brown to authorize all future medical treatment and pay temporary disability benefits from November 2025 forward. Brown countered that it authorized medical treatment and recently offered specialist panels, from which Mr. Meadows made selections. It also disputed Mr. Meadows’s entitlement to temporary disability benefits. For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Meadows is not entitled to the requested benefits.

Claim History

On July 12, 2025, Mr. Meadows suffered injuries to his head, knees, back, hip, and right foot while operating a piece of heavy equipment. He received emergency treatment due to a scalp laceration but did not introduce those records.

In September 2025, Brown terminated Mr. Meadows for missing work. He began working for another construction company in October 2025 and continues working there, making a higher hourly wage.

The First Report showed that Brown reported Mr. Meadows’s injury to its

1 carrier in December 2025 despite receiving notice of the injury on July 12.1 After Brown reported the claim, Mr. Meadows selected Dr. Robert Sass from a panel.

Mr. Meadows saw Dr. Sass from January 2026 to March but did not introduce those office notes. He diagnosed thoracic, lumbar, sacroiliac, right-hip, and pelvis sprains along with chronic, post-traumatic headaches. Dr. Sass placed Mr. Meadows on restricted duty and referenced a possible seizure. In March, Dr. Sass diagnosed a right-acetabular labrum tear.

Brown recently offered Mr. Meadows specialist panels, from which he selected Dr. Larry Gibson, neurologist, and Dr. Rickey Hutcheson, orthopedist, on April 17.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Meadows must prove a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits that he is entitled to the requested benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

First, Brown accepted Mr. Meadows’s claim, and no present disputes exist about his treatment. Requests to order Brown to authorize all future treatment require an advisory opinion, which the Court must not do. Charter Lakeside Behavioral Health Sys. v. Tenn. Health Facilities Comm’n, 2001 Tenn. App. LEXIS 58, at *14 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 30, 2001).

Next, Mr. Meadows sought temporary disability benefits from November 2025 forward. To receive temporary total disability benefits, Mr. Meadows must show: (1) a disability from working as the result of a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period of disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). For temporary partial disability benefits, he must show that Dr. Sass returned him to work with restrictions that an employer either could not or would not accommodate. Id. at *7-8.

Here, Mr. Meadows did not submit any medical records from November 2025 forward. Instead, he offered records from January 2026 to March. No

1 The First Report showed July 17, 2025, as the injury date; however, the petition and all filings showed July 12. 2 documentation shows that a doctor took Mr. Meadows off work due to his work injuries, so he is not entitled to temporary total disability benefits.

Likewise, Mr. Meadows acknowledged working for a new employer at a higher pay rate from October 2025 forward. However, he did not introduce documentation showing that he earned less on restricted duty than he made on his injury date, so Mr. Meadows is not entitled to temporary partial disability benefits. Therefore, the Court finds that Mr. Meadows is unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in his request for temporary disability benefits.

Finally, the First Report shows Brown waited over four months before it reported the claim, and Mr. Meadows did not receive a panel until over four months after his injury. Therefore, the Court refers this case to the Compliance Program for penalty assessments based on Brown’s late filing of the accident report and late offering of a panel. Id. § 50-6-118(a)(2), (9).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court denies Mr. Meadows’s request for benefits at this time.

2. This case is referred to the Compliance Program for penalties for Brown’s late filing of the accident report and late offering of a panel.

3. The parties shall appear for a Status Hearing on Monday, August 10, 2026, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time/2:00 p.m. Central Time. The parties must call 423- 634-0164 or 855-383-0001 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED May 4, 2026.

JUDGE AUDREY HEADRICK Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3 APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Rule 72 Declarations of Mr. Meadows, March 9, 2026, and March 12, 2026 2. First Report 3. Concentra records 4. Prime Imaging records 5. 2024 Wages and Salary Summary Attachment; 2025 W-2 form; photos; text messages; handwritten note (For identification purposes only) 6. Panels (orthopedic and neurology) 7. Willing Family Chiropractic: undated, handwritten note and typed document with attachments2 8. Handwritten note of Mr. Meadows (For identification purposes only) 9. Mr. Meadows’s discovery responses 10.Erlanger Medical Center (October 8, 2017; May 15, 2024; October 31, 2024; November 15, 2026) 11.Concentra Toxicology Result Certificate, January 15, 2026 12.Wage Statement

2 The Court questions the authenticity of the documents and gives them no weight. 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this order was sent as shown on May 4, 2026.

Name Mail Email Service sent to: Hunter Meadows, X X Employee

Nicholas J. Peterson, X Nick.peterson@petersonwhite.com Employer’s Attorney Beverly.uphoff@petersonwhite.com Compliance Program X WCCompliance.program@tn.gov

____________________________________ PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

5 Right to Appeal: If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To do so, you must: 1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline. ¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed. ¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the Compensation Order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Meadows, Hunter v. Brown Bros., Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadows-hunter-v-brown-bros-inc-tennworkcompcl-2026.