Meadowbrook III, Ltd. v. Johnson, No. Spnh 9502 42296 (Mar. 31, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Meadowbrook III, Ltd. v. Johnson, No. Spnh 9502 42296 (Mar. 31, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2507

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1995

DocketNo. SPNH 9502 42296

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2507 (Meadowbrook III, Ltd. v. Johnson, No. Spnh 9502 42296 (Mar. 31, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meadowbrook III, Ltd. v. Johnson, No. Spnh 9502 42296 (Mar. 31, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2507 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE' WHETHER NOT FILING THE SHERIFF'S RETURNON THE NOTICE TO QUIT CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH FILING THE COMPLAINT DEPRIVESTHE COURT OF JURISDICTION Defendant Cynthia Johnson contends that this summary process action should be dismissed for several reasons, including the fact that the sheriff's return was not filed contemporaneously with the filing of the complaint. As stated in defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47a-26 suggests that the sheriff's return on the notice to quit should be filed at some time prior to judgment.

For the foregoing reason and for the reasons addressed during oral argument, the Court has denied the Motion to Dismiss.

CT Page 2508

Clarence J. Jones, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE' WHETHER NOT FILING THE SHERIFF'S RETURNON THE NOTICE TO QUIT CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH FILING THE COMPLAINT DEPRIVESTHE COURT OF JURISDICTION Defendant Cynthia Johnson contends that this summary process action should be dismissed for several reasons, including the fact that the sheriff's return was not filed contemporaneously with the filing of the complaint. As stated in defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47a-26 suggests that the sheriff's return on the notice to quit should be filed at some time prior to judgment.

For the foregoing reason and for the reasons addressed during oral argument, the Court has denied the Motion to Dismiss.

CT Page 2508

Clarence J. Jones, Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadowbrook-iii-ltd-v-johnson-no-spnh-9502-42296-mar-31-1995-connsuperct-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack