MEADOW BROOK NAT'L BANK OF FREEPORT v. Ferkin
This text of 104 N.E.2d 916 (MEADOW BROOK NAT'L BANK OF FREEPORT v. Ferkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Meadow Brook National Bank of Freeport, Respondent,
v.
Louis Ferkin, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Louis Ferkin, in person, and Harry E. Kreindler for appellant.
Sidney Friedman for respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. Dissenting: DYE, J.
Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and order of Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. The record before us presents questions of law, which turn upon questions of fact, which should be determined only upon a record made on a full trial of the case. No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 N.E.2d 916, 303 N.Y. 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadow-brook-natl-bank-of-freeport-v-ferkin-ny-1952.