Meadow Brook National Bank v. Putnam Fur Farm, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meadow Brook National Bank v. Putnam Fur Farm, Inc.

6 A.D.2d 878, 177 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5190

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 878 (Meadow Brook National Bank v. Putnam Fur Farm, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meadow Brook National Bank v. Putnam Fur Farm, Inc., 6 A.D.2d 878, 177 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an' action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, a holder of a chattel mortgage on certain “ mink cages ” on the premises who did not appear or answer, appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate and set aside (1) an ex parte order amending the judgment of foreclosure and sale, and (2) the amended judgment, or in the alternative to modify said ex parte order and said amended judgment by striking from the final paragraph of each, the words “mink cages”. Appeal dismissed, without costs, and without prejudice to such further proceedings as appellant may be advised to take (Civ. Prac. Act, § 557, subd. 1; Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Extension Development Co., 154 App. Div. 305, 307-308). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an' action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, a holder of a chattel mortgage on certain “ mink cages ” on the premises who did not appear or answer, appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate and set aside (1) an ex parte order amending the judgment of foreclosure and sale, and (2) the amended judgment, or in the alternative to modify said ex parte order and said amended judgment by striking from the final paragraph of each, the words “mink cages”. Appeal dismissed, without costs, and without prejudice to such further proceedings as appellant may be advised to take (Civ. Prac. Act, § 557, subd. 1; Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Extension Development Co., 154 App. Div. 305, 307-308). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 878, 177 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadow-brook-national-bank-v-putnam-fur-farm-inc-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack