Meadors v. State

483 S.W.3d 469, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 233, 2016 WL 1085705
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 15, 2016
DocketNo. ED 102824
StatusPublished

This text of 483 S.W.3d 469 (Meadors v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meadors v. State, 483 S.W.3d 469, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 233, 2016 WL 1085705 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

James Meadors appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Jones raises one point on appeal: that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel should have raised the defense of entrapment. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
483 S.W.3d 469, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 233, 2016 WL 1085705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadors-v-state-moctapp-2016.