Meador v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Meador v. State

308 S.W.3d 264, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 450, 2010 WL 1460302

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 13, 2010

DocketED 93059

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 308 S.W.3d 264 (Meador v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meador v. State, 308 S.W.3d 264, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 450, 2010 WL 1460302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bill D. Meador appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would-have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bill D. Meador appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would-have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 S.W.3d 264, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 450, 2010 WL 1460302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meador-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack