Meador v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Meador v. State

157 S.W.3d 759, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 381, 2005 WL 613247

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2005

DocketNo. ED 84558

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 S.W.3d 759 (Meador v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meador v. State, 157 S.W.3d 759, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 381, 2005 WL 613247 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

[760]*760ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Meador (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief (motion) after an evidentiary hearing. Movant pled guilty in Cause No. 02CR736360-01 to one count of second-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.0601. The plea court sentenced Movant to four years’ imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Movant thereafter timely filed his pro se and amended motions alleging ineffective assistance of his plea counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[760]*760ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Meador (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief (motion) after an evidentiary hearing. Movant pled guilty in Cause No. 02CR736360-01 to one count of second-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.0601. The plea court sentenced Movant to four years’ imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Movant thereafter timely filed his pro se and amended motions alleging ineffective assistance of his plea counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.W.3d 759, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 381, 2005 WL 613247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meador-v-state-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack