Meaders v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Meaders v. Stansberry

131 F. App'x 962

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2005·No. No. 05-6067·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William James Meaders, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order de[963]*963nying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Meaders v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-666-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William James Meaders, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order de[963]*963nying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Meaders v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-666-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Meaders v. Stansberry, 131 F. App'x 962 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

131 F. App'x 962 (Meaders v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related