Meaders v. Lee

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 21, 2004
• Docket: 04-7027
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7027

FRANKLIN DELYNN MEADERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RANDALL LEE; J. BOYD BENNETT; THEODIS BECK; JANE DOE; MR. WHITE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-880-5-CT-H)

Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin Delynn Meaders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Franklin Delynn Meaders appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Meaders v. Lee, No. CA-03-880-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. May 3,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -