Meader v. Rose

Suffolk County Court

Meader v. Rose

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 819

CourtNew York County Court, Suffolk County

DecidedJuly 31, 1677

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 819 (Meader v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Suffolk County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meader v. Rose, 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 819 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1677).

Pincite

Opinion

John Meader plaint. agt Roger Rose Defendt in an action of the case for not performing a bargain made with sd Meader last Spring [820]*820whereby sd Rose did engage himselfe to bring for the plaint. from Oyster River about fifteen or Sixteen cord of timber &c. but hath not performed his bargain whereby the plaint. is damnified about five pounds with all other due damages &c. . . . The Jury . . found the case not actionable and gave the Defendt costs of Court allowd £.1:4.2.

Execution issued 8br 20° 77.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Meader plaint. agt Roger Rose Defendt in an action of the case for not performing a bargain made with sd Meader last Spring [820]*820whereby sd Rose did engage himselfe to bring for the plaint. from Oyster River about fifteen or Sixteen cord of timber &c. but hath not performed his bargain whereby the plaint. is damnified about five pounds with all other due damages &c. . . . The Jury . . found the case not actionable and gave the Defendt costs of Court allowd £.1:4.2.

Execution issued 8br 20° 77.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meader-v-rose-nysuffolkctyct-1677.