Meader v. Archer

23 A. 521, 65 N.H. 214
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 23 A. 521 (Meader v. Archer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meader v. Archer, 23 A. 521, 65 N.H. 214 (N.H. 1889).

Opinion

Doe, G. J.

Holt’s mother outlived him and owned the land at the time of her death, and the plaintiffs are her next of kin. The defendant is Holt’s adopted son. As Holt had no title, the land did not go to the defendant as Holt’s heir. By the law of the defendant’s adoption, he could inherit property which Holt “could have devised by will.” This land Holt could not have devised. By the same law, “ as to the succession to property,” the defendant stands, “ in regard to the legal descendants, but to no other of the kindred of” Holt, in the same position as if he were Holt’s son. This does not make him an heir of Holt’s mother. No objection being made in argument to the form of action, the question of procedure has not been considered.

Case discharged.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Derlyn v. Mack
66 L.R.A. 437 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)
Bray v. Miles
54 N.E. 446 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
In re Estate of Renton
3 Coffey 519 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A. 521, 65 N.H. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meader-v-archer-nh-1889.