Meade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Meade v. State

734 So. 2d 1204, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9086, 1999 WL 454461

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 7, 1999

DocketNo. 98-3652

StatusPublished

This text of 734 So. 2d 1204 (Meade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meade v. State, 734 So. 2d 1204, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9086, 1999 WL 454461 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment of conviction for aggravated battery (Count I) and criminal mischief (Count II), but remand for correction of the judgment, which, as the state concedes, should reflect a conviction on Count II of criminal mischief, a second degree misdemeanor, rather than criminal mischief, a first-degree misdemeanor. See § 806.13(1)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (1997).

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part.

SHAHOOD, TAYLOR, JJ., and ROTHSCHILD, RONALD J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment of conviction for aggravated battery (Count I) and criminal mischief (Count II), but remand for correction of the judgment, which, as the state concedes, should reflect a conviction on Count II of criminal mischief, a second degree misdemeanor, rather than criminal mischief, a first-degree misdemeanor. See § 806.13(1)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (1997).

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part.

SHAHOOD, TAYLOR, JJ., and ROTHSCHILD, RONALD J., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

734 So. 2d 1204, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9086, 1999 WL 454461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meade-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.