Mead v. Zika

159 N.Y.S. 181
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 26, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 N.Y.S. 181 (Mead v. Zika) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mead v. Zika, 159 N.Y.S. 181 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[1, 2] No appeal will lie from an order granting or denying a motion for a retaxation of costs. The order can only be reviewed upon an appeal from the judgment. No question of the jurisdiction of the court arises in this case, and therefore it does not fall within the purview of section 154, subdivision 8, of the Municipal Court Code.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boslow v. J. Rosenbaum & Co.
120 Misc. 59 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 N.Y.S. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-zika-nyappterm-1916.