Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Mead v. Zika

Mead v. Zika

159 N.Y.S. 181
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 26, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[1, 2] No appeal will lie from an order granting or denying a motion for a retaxation of costs. The order can only be reviewed upon an appeal from the judgment. No question of the jurisdiction of the court arises in this case, and therefore it does not fall within the purview of section 154, subdivision 8, of the Municipal Court Code.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mead v. Zika, 159 N.Y.S. 181 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

159 N.Y.S. 181 (Mead v. Zika) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boslow v. J. Rosenbaum & Co.
120 Misc. 59 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)