Mead v. White
This text of 8 A. 913 (Mead v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It may be conceded that the written memoranda were not ad[42]*42missible as entries made in the course of business in a book of original entries, yet it is well settled that a witness may use a paper containing a list of items to refresh his memory, when be knows the entry to have been correct when he made it. Tbe alleged settlement having been attacked, it was clearly admissible to prove tbe several items which preceded it, and were claimed to have been considered and included in the settlement.
We see no error in the rulings relating to the admission of evidence, nor in the charge of the court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A. 913, 6 Sadler 38, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-white-pa-1887.