Mead v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mead v. State

438 So. 2d 410, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24429

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 1983·No. No. 82-2203·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant James William Mead appeals his conviction for first degree murder entered below. His sole point on appeal is that the state failed to adduce sufficient evidence at trial to establish the essential element of premeditation herein. We reject this contention upon a holding that the defendant’s statement to the police, which was admitted in evidence below, adequately established the above-stated element of premeditation in this case. Sireci v. State, 399 So.2d 964, 967 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862 (1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant James William Mead appeals his conviction for first degree murder entered below. His sole point on appeal is that the state failed to adduce sufficient evidence at trial to establish the essential element of premeditation herein. We reject this contention upon a holding that the defendant’s statement to the police, which was admitted in evidence below, adequately established the above-stated element of premeditation in this case. Sireci v. State, 399 So.2d 964, 967 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862 (1982).

Affirmed.

Mead v. State, 438 So. 2d 410, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24429 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

438 So. 2d 410 (Mead v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related