Mead v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mead v. State

438 So. 2d 410, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24429

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 6, 1983

DocketNo. 82-2203

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 So. 2d 410 (Mead v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mead v. State, 438 So. 2d 410, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24429 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant James William Mead appeals his conviction for first degree murder entered below. His sole point on appeal is that the state failed to adduce sufficient evidence at trial to establish the essential element of premeditation herein. We reject this contention upon a holding that the defendant’s statement to the police, which was admitted in evidence below, adequately established the above-stated element of premeditation in this case. Sireci v. State, 399 So.2d 964, 967 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862 (1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant James William Mead appeals his conviction for first degree murder entered below. His sole point on appeal is that the state failed to adduce sufficient evidence at trial to establish the essential element of premeditation herein. We reject this contention upon a holding that the defendant’s statement to the police, which was admitted in evidence below, adequately established the above-stated element of premeditation in this case. Sireci v. State, 399 So.2d 964, 967 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862 (1982).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 So. 2d 410, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack