Mead v. Sherwood
This text of 25 A.D.2d 744 (Mead v. Sherwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Amended judgment in favor of defendants unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered, with $50 costs to abide the event. We agree with the trial court that when plaintiffs in this personal injury action rested they had proved a prima facie case and it was proper to deny defendants’ motion to dismiss. Accordingly, when defendants also rested after such denial, the issues should have been submitted to the jury and not determined by the court, notwithstanding that motions for direction of a verdict were made by both sides (Squillante v. Los Cab Corp., 23 A D 2d 656).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 744, 269 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-sherwood-nyappdiv-1966.