Mead v. Reilly

686 N.E.2d 1358, 90 N.Y.2d 930, 664 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 3163
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 23, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 686 N.E.2d 1358 (Mead v. Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mead v. Reilly, 686 N.E.2d 1358, 90 N.Y.2d 930, 664 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 3163 (N.Y. 1997).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellants’ postjudgment motion to set aside the verdict, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 N.E.2d 1358, 90 N.Y.2d 930, 664 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 3163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-reilly-ny-1997.