Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad

The Superior Court of New York City

Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad

12 Misc. 646

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJuly 1, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Misc. 646 (Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad, 12 Misc. 646 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cu/riam.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cu/riam.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Misc. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-new-york-elevated-railroad-nysuperctnyc-1895.