Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad

The Superior Court of New York City

Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad

12 Misc. 646

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided July 1, 1895·Published

Opinion

Per Cu/riam.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cu/riam.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad, 12 Misc. 646 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

12 Misc. 646 (Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.