Mead v. New York El. R. Co.

66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 6, 1895·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below. The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mead v. New York El. R. Co., 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871 (Mead v. New York El. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.