Mead v. New York El. R. Co.
66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871
This text of 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871 (Mead v. New York El. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mead v. New York El. R. Co., 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below. The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-new-york-el-r-co-nysuperctnyc-1895.