Home/New York Court of Appeals/Mead v. Levitt

Mead v. Levitt

539 N.E.2d 1109, 74 N.Y.2d 634, 541 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 464
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 4, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 539 N.E.2d 1109 (Mead v. Levitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mead v. Levitt, 539 N.E.2d 1109, 74 N.Y.2d 634, 541 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 464 (N.Y. 1989).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

[636]*636We agree with the Appellate Division’s statement, in its order granting leave to appeal, that the issues addressed by petitioner in his appellate brief are unpreserved and are, therefore, beyond the scope of our review.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur; Judge Kaye taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 N.E.2d 1109, 74 N.Y.2d 634, 541 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-levitt-ny-1989.