Mead v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mead v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission

734 S.W.2d 529, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4101

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 19, 1987·No. No. 52017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Claimant appeals from the decision of the circuit court affirming the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission adopting the decision of the appeals referee finding claimant disqualified for unemployment benefits.

The finding of the commission that claimant left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to his work or to his employer, § 288.050.1(1), RSMo 1986, is supported by competent and substantial evidence, and is correct as a matter of law. The record supports a finding the appeals tribunal provided claimant a fair hearing.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Claimant appeals from the decision of the circuit court affirming the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission adopting the decision of the appeals referee finding claimant disqualified for unemployment benefits.

The finding of the commission that claimant left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to his work or to his employer, § 288.050.1(1), RSMo 1986, is supported by competent and substantial evidence, and is correct as a matter of law. The record supports a finding the appeals tribunal provided claimant a fair hearing.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Mead v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, 734 S.W.2d 529, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4101 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

734 S.W.2d 529 (Mead v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.