Mead v. Hartwell
8 Misc. 693, 28 N.Y.S. 1150
This text of 8 Misc. 693 (Mead v. Hartwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mead v. Hartwell, 8 Misc. 693, 28 N.Y.S. 1150 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
There is nothing in the objections of the appellants.
It is too finely drawn. The summons complies with the order and its intent.
The order is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.
Ehrlich, Ch. J., and Vah Wyck, J., concur.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Misc. 693, 28 N.Y.S. 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-hartwell-nynyccityct-1894.