Mead v. Harbor Park Associates, No. Cv97 0158043 S (Oct. 16, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12884
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided October 16, 2000·No. No. CV97 0158043 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Since Connecticut pursues a liberal policy in allowing amendments;Johnson v. Toscano, 144 Conn. 582, 587, 136 A.2d 341 (1957); and this court has broad discretion in deciding whether to allow an amendment to the pleadings; Connecticut National Bank v. Voog, 233 Conn. 352, 364,658 A.2d 172 (1995), the plaintiff's request for leave to amend is hereby granted and the defendant's objection is hereby overruled because the plaintiff has not alleged a new cause of action. See Zorick v. Schwartz, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford at Hartford, Docket No. 565814 (July 19, 1999, Mulcahy, J.) (25 Conn.L.Rptr. 146). CT Page 12885

RICHARD J. TOBIN, JUDGE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mead v. Harbor Park Associates, No. Cv97 0158043 S (Oct. 16, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12884 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12884 (Mead v. Harbor Park Associates, No. Cv97 0158043 S (Oct. 16, 2000)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Toscano
136 A.2d 341 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1957)
Connecticut National Bank v. Voog
659 A.2d 172 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)