Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Mead v. Harbor Park Associates, No. Cv97 0158043 S (Oct. 16, 2000)

Mead v. Harbor Park Associates, No. Cv97 0158043 S (Oct. 16, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12884
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedOctober 16, 2000
DocketNo. CV97 0158043 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12884 (Mead v. Harbor Park Associates, No. Cv97 0158043 S (Oct. 16, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mead v. Harbor Park Associates, No. Cv97 0158043 S (Oct. 16, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12884 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Since Connecticut pursues a liberal policy in allowing amendments;Johnson v. Toscano, 144 Conn. 582, 587, 136 A.2d 341 (1957); and this court has broad discretion in deciding whether to allow an amendment to the pleadings; Connecticut National Bank v. Voog, 233 Conn. 352, 364,658 A.2d 172 (1995), the plaintiff's request for leave to amend is hereby granted and the defendant's objection is hereby overruled because the plaintiff has not alleged a new cause of action. See Zorick v. Schwartz, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford at Hartford, Docket No. 565814 (July 19, 1999, Mulcahy, J.) (25 Conn.L.Rptr. 146). CT Page 12885

RICHARD J. TOBIN, JUDGE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Toscano
136 A.2d 341 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1957)
Connecticut National Bank v. Voog
659 A.2d 172 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-harbor-park-associates-no-cv97-0158043-s-oct-16-2000-connsuperct-2000.