Mead v. Consolidated Metal Spinning & Stamping Co.
208 A.D. 814
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order denying motion to open default affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While the courts are disposed to open defaults on terms, the plaintiff in this case appears to have been guilty of such gross laches and inexcusable disregard of the order directing service of the bill of particulars, that we see no reason for interfering with the discretion of the justice at Special Term who denied the motion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mead v. Consolidated Metal Spinning & Stamping Co., 208 A.D. 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
208 A.D. 814 (Mead v. Consolidated Metal Spinning & Stamping Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W. R. Simmons & Associates Research, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.
37 Misc. 2d 62 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Nappi v. Bush Terminal Building Co.
2 A.D.2d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Schmitt v. Pietrangelo
285 A.D. 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)