Mead v. Consolidated Metal Spinning & Stamping Co.
This text of 208 A.D. 814 (Mead v. Consolidated Metal Spinning & Stamping Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to open default affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While the courts are disposed to open defaults on terms, the plaintiff in this case appears to have been guilty of such gross laches and inexcusable disregard of the order directing service of the bill of particulars, that we see no reason for interfering with the discretion of the justice at Special Term who denied the motion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 A.D. 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-consolidated-metal-spinning-stamping-co-nyappdiv-1924.