Home/New York Court of Appeals/Mead v. Bloom

Mead v. Bloom

465 N.E.2d 1262, 62 N.Y.2d 788, 477 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4371
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 17, 1984·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice James H. Boomer at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 423).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Judge Wachtler dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mead v. Bloom, 465 N.E.2d 1262, 62 N.Y.2d 788, 477 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4371 (N.Y. 1984).

465 N.E.2d 1262 (Mead v. Bloom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.
69 F. Supp. 2d 678 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1999)
Andrulonis v. United States
724 F. Supp. 1421 (N.D. New York, 1989)
Rivers v. State
142 Misc. 2d 563 (New York State Court of Claims, 1989)
Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
677 F. Supp. 151 (S.D. New York, 1988)
Cover v. Cohen
113 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Ott v. Barash
109 A.D.2d 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)