Mead v. Bloom

459 N.E.2d 192, 60 N.Y.2d 926, 471 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3568
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 23, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 459 N.E.2d 192 (Mead v. Bloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mead v. Bloom, 459 N.E.2d 192, 60 N.Y.2d 926, 471 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3568 (N.Y. 1983).

Opinion

[927]*927Motion to dismiss cross appeal taken by Hallman Adkins Chevrolet granted and said cross appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that cross-appellant is not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [iii]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
459 N.E.2d 192, 60 N.Y.2d 926, 471 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-v-bloom-ny-1983.