Mead Corp. v. Schneider

224 N.E.2d 341, 9 Ohio St. 2d 157, 38 Ohio Op. 2d 377, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 438
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1967
DocketNo. 40463
StatusPublished

This text of 224 N.E.2d 341 (Mead Corp. v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mead Corp. v. Schneider, 224 N.E.2d 341, 9 Ohio St. 2d 157, 38 Ohio Op. 2d 377, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 438 (Ohio 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The operative facts in the instant case are substantially the same as those in the case of Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. Donahue, Tax Commr., 7 Ohio St. 2d 29. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed on authority of that case.

Decision affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Kerns and Brown, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Schneider, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. Donahue
218 N.E.2d 452 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 N.E.2d 341, 9 Ohio St. 2d 157, 38 Ohio Op. 2d 377, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mead-corp-v-schneider-ohio-1967.