Meacham v. Higginbotham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Meacham v. Higginbotham

32 S.E.2d 875, 206 S.C. 75, 1945 S.C. LEXIS 41

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 6, 1945·No. 15710·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

A detailed discussion of the testimony in this case would be of no value to future litigants, and of course the parties to this action are familiar with all of the facts surrounding the transaction out of which this litigation arose .

*83 We have read with care the record, the greater portion of it twice; and it is our considered opinion that the order of the learned Circuit Judge (now an Associate Justice of this Court) reached the equitable and correct result irrespective of where the burden of proof lies. Let the said order be reported.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

A detailed discussion of the testimony in this case would be of no value to future litigants, and of course the parties to this action are familiar with all of the facts surrounding the transaction out of which this litigation arose .

*83 We have read with care the record, the greater portion of it twice; and it is our considered opinion that the order of the learned Circuit Judge (now an Associate Justice of this Court) reached the equitable and correct result irrespective of where the burden of proof lies. Let the said order be reported.

Affirmed.

Meacham v. Higginbotham, 32 S.E.2d 875, 206 S.C. 75, 1945 S.C. LEXIS 41 (S.C. 1945).

Pincite

32 S.E.2d 875 (Meacham v. Higginbotham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.