ME2 Productions v. Morris
This text of ME2 Productions v. Morris (ME2 Productions v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff, AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. Case No. 2:17-cv-00198-DN JOSETTE MORRIS, ALLEN BENTLEY, RAFAEL CASTILLO, JULIO CATTANEO, District Judge David Nuffer and KIM NEWMAN,
Defendants.
Plaintiff ME2 Productions, Inc. seeks entry of default judgment, a permanent injunction, and an award of attorney’s fees against Defendants Josette Morris, Allen Bentley, Rafael Castillo, Julio Cattaneo, and Kim Newman.1 Specifically, Plaintiff seeks an award of $10,000 in statutory damages against each Defendant; a permanent injunction enjoining each Defendant from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff’s copyright in the motion picture Mechanic: Resurrection; and an award of costs and attorney’s fees.2 Plaintiff’s counsel in this case is the same as the plaintiff’s counsel in LHF Productions, Inc. v. Gonzales et al., No. 2:17-cv-00103-DN (D. Utah). A complaint3 and motion for default judgment4 were filed in Gonzales, which are substantively identical to those filed in this case.5
1 Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Attorney’s Fees as to Certain Defendants (“Motion”), docket no. 88, filed August 6, 2020. 2 Id. at 2. 3 Amended Complaint for Copyright Infringement and Jury Demand, ECF No. 81 in Gonzales, filed June 20, 2019. 4 Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Permanent Injunction and Attorney’s Fees as to Certain Defendants, ECF No. 96, filed June 29, 2020. 5 Amended Complaint for Copyright Infringement and Jury Demand, docket no. 78, filed June 17, 2019; Motion, supra note 1. The only relevant differences are: the named Plaintiff; the copyrighted work; the named Defendants; and the Defendants against whom default judgment is sought. On October 28, 2020, a Memorandum Decision and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Default Judgment was entered in Gonzales (“Gonzales Memorandum Decision and Order”).6 Because this case and Gonzales are substantively identical, the Gonzales
Memorandum Decision and Order’s analysis, findings of fact, and conclusions of law7 are adopted in total and apply to Plaintiff’s Motion in this case. Defendants were served8 with Plaintiff’s Complaint; failed to timely appear and respond; and the Clerk has entered the default of each Defendant.9 A copy of the default certificate was mailed to Morris, but was returned as undeliverable.10 Accordingly, the discussion below applies to Bentley, Castillo, Cattaneo, and Newman (“Remaining Defendants”) but not to Morris. Additionally, the factual allegations of Plaintiff’s Complaint, which are deemed admitted,11 demonstrate that each of the Remaining Defendants is liable for willfully infringing12 Plaintiff’s copyright in the motion picture Mechanic: Resurrection through use of BitTorrent protocols over
the Internet. Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to entry of a default judgment against the Remaining Defendants, which includes an award of statutory damages13 against each of the Remaining
6 ECF No. 101 in Gonzales, filed Oct. 28, 2020 (“Gonzales Memorandum Decision and Order”). 7 Id. at 2-25. 8 Proof of Service Declaration of Todd E. Zenger, docket no. 80, filed June 11, 2020. 9 Entry of Default Pursuant to FRCP 55(a) as to Certain Defendants, docket no. 86, filed July 31, 2020. 10 Docket no. 89, filed August 10, 2020. 11 Tripodi v. Welch, 810 F.3d 761, 764-65 (10th Cir. 2016). 12 17 U.S.C. §§ 411(a), 501; La Resolana Architects, PA v. Reno, Inc., 555 F.3d 1171, 1177-1180 (10th Cir. 2009). 13 17 U.S.C. § 504(c). Defendants and a permanent injunction14 enjoining each of the Remaining Defendants from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff’s copyright. Plaintiff is also entitled to an award of its costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.15 But because an award of $750 in statutory damages against each of the Remaining Defendants is just under the circumstances,16 rather than the $10,000 requested, Plaintiff’s Motion17 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion18 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Default judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiff and against each of the Remaining Defendants, but not against Morris. The default judgment shall include an award to Plaintiff of $750 in statutory damages against each of the Remaining Defendants and a permanent injunction enjoining each of the Remaining Defendants from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff’s copyright in the motion picture Mechanic: Resurrection. Plaintiff is also entitled to an award of its costs and reasonable attorney’s fees, the amount of which shall be determined by subsequent motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before November 20, 2020, Plaintiff shall verify
a current address for Morris and file a Notice of Change of Address. Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment against Morris within 14 days of that filing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any motion for attorney’s fees must be filed within 14 days after the default judgement’s entry.
14 Id. § 502(a). 15 Id. § 505. 16 Gonzales Memorandum Decision and Order at 4-25. 17 Docket no. 88, filed August 6, 2020. 18 Docket no. 88, filed August 6, 2020. Signed November 9, 2020. BY THE COURT
David Nuffer United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ME2 Productions v. Morris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/me2-productions-v-morris-utd-2020.