ME2 Productions v. Hooley

CourtDistrict Court, D. Utah
DecidedNovember 12, 2020
Docket2:17-cv-00662
StatusUnknown

This text of ME2 Productions v. Hooley (ME2 Productions v. Hooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ME2 Productions v. Hooley, (D. Utah 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff, AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. Case No. 2:17-cv-00662-DN THOMAS HOOLEY, et al., District Judge David Nuffer Defendants.

Plaintiff ME2 Productions, Inc. seeks entry of default judgment, a permanent injunction, and an award of attorney’s fees against Defendants Thomas Hooley and Steve Rosenboom.1 Specifically, Plaintiff seeks an award of $10,000 in statutory damages against each Defendant; a permanent injunction enjoining each Defendant from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff’s copyright in the motion picture Mechanic: Resurrection; and an award of costs and attorney’s fees.2 Plaintiff’s counsel in this case is the same as the plaintiff’s counsel in LHF Productions, Inc. v. Gonzales et al., No. 2:17-cv-00103-DN (D. Utah). A complaint3 and motion for default judgment4 were filed in Gonzales, which are substantively identical to those filed in this case.5

1 Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Attorney’s Fees as to Certain Defendants (“Motion”), docket no. 71, filed August 6, 2020. 2 Id. at 2. 3 Amended Complaint for Copyright Infringement and Jury Demand, ECF No. 81 in Gonzales, filed June 20, 2019. 4 Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Permanent Injunction and Attorney’s Fees as to Certain Defendants, ECF No. 96, filed June 29, 2020. 5 Amended Complaint for Copyright Infringement and Jury Demand, docket no. 65, filed June 17, 2019; Motion, docket no. 71, filed August 6, 2020. The only relevant differences are: the named Plaintiff; the copyrighted work; the named Defendants; and the Defendants against whom default judgment is sought. On October 28, 2020, a Memorandum Decision and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Default Judgment was entered in Gonzales (“Gonzales Memorandum Decision and Order”).6 Because this case and Gonzales are substantively identical, the Gonzales

Memorandum Decisions and Order’s analysis, findings of fact, and conclusions of law7 are adopted in total and apply to Plaintiff’s Motion in this case. Defendants were served8 with Plaintiff’s Complaint; failed to timely appear and respond; and the Clerk has entered the default of each Defendant.9 Additionally, the factual allegations of Plaintiff’s Complaint, which are deemed admitted,10 demonstrate that each Defendant is liable for willfully infringing11 Plaintiff’s copyright in the motion picture Mechanic: Resurrection through use of BitTorrent protocols over the Internet. Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to entry of a default judgment against Defendants, which includes an award of statutory damages12 against each Defendant and a permanent injunction13

enjoining each Defendant from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff’s copyright. Plaintiff is also entitled to an award of its costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.14 But because an award of

6 ECF No. 101 in Gonzales, filed Oct. 28, 2020 (“Gonzales Memorandum Decision and Order”). 7 Id. at 2-25. 8 Affidavit of Service, docket no. 67, filed June 9, 2020. 9 Entry of Default Pursuant to FRCP 55(a) as to Certain Defendants, docket no. 70, filed July 31, 2020. 10 Tripodi v. Welch, 810 F.3d 761, 764-65 (10th Cir. 2016). 11 17 U.S.C. §§ 411(a), 501; La Resolana Architects, PA v. Reno, Inc., 555 F.3d 1171, 1177-1180 (10th Cir. 2009). 12 17 U.S.C. § 504(c). 13 Id. § 502(a). 14 Id. § 505. $750 in statutory damages against each Defendant is just under the circumstances,’ rather than the $10,000 requested, Plaintiff's Motion’® is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion!’ is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Default judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiff and against each Defendant. The default judgment shall include an award to Plaintiff of $750 in statutory damages against each Defendant and a permanent injunction enjoming each Defendant from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff's copyright in the motion picture Mechanic: Resurrection. Plaintiff is also entitled to an award of its costs and reasonable attorney’s fees, the amount of which shall be determined by subsequent motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any motion for attorney’s fees must be filed within 14 days after the default judgement’s entry. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed November 10, 2020.

DavidNuffer ss—i—‘is—sSS United States District Judge

Gonzales Memorandum Decision and Order at 4-25. 16 Motion, docket no. 71, filed August 6, 2020. 17 Motion, docket no. 71, filed August 6, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

La Resolana Architects, PA v. Reno, Inc.
555 F.3d 1171 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
Tripodi v. Welch
810 F.3d 761 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ME2 Productions v. Hooley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/me2-productions-v-hooley-utd-2020.