ME Dept Human Svcs v. Marcello

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedMarch 20, 2002
Docket01-2462
StatusPublished

This text of ME Dept Human Svcs v. Marcello (ME Dept Human Svcs v. Marcello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ME Dept Human Svcs v. Marcello, (1st Cir. 2002).

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 01-2462

STATE OF MAINE, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

JAMES MARCELLO; OLIVIA MARCELLO,

Defendants, Appellants.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lynch, Circuit Judge.

James C. Marcello and Olivia A. Marcello on brief pro se. G. Steven Rowe, Attorney General, and Andrew S. Hagler, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

March 19, 2002 Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and

the record on appeal. Upon our review, we conclude that the

filings were correctly dismissed. We, therefore, affirm the

district court’s October 2, 2001 judgment of dismissal,

essentially for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s

Recommended Decision of September 28, 2001.

The appellants’ request for oral argument is denied.

The judgment of dismissal is affirmed.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ME Dept Human Svcs v. Marcello, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/me-dept-human-svcs-v-marcello-ca1-2002.