M'Dowell v. Van Deusen

12 Johns. 356
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1815·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plea puis darrein continuance, was properly overruled. Admitting the truth of the matter set forth in it, it was not such as the defendant could avail himself of, to prevent the trial. It is a general principle, (1 Inst. 294. 2 Inst. 422.) that a judge cannot be excepted to, or challenged, for corrup-. tian ; but must be punished by indictment, or impeachment. If this plea could not be supported, it was agreed by the parties that judgment should be rendered for the plaintiffs. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M'Dowell v. Van Deusen, 12 Johns. 356 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).

12 Johns. 356 (M'Dowell v. Van Deusen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Capuano
68 Misc. 2d 481 (New York County Courts, 1971)
Truesdell v. Winne
44 Misc. 451 (New York County Courts, 1904)
Graham v. Selbie
67 N.W. 831 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1896)
Waldron v. Berry
51 N.H. 136 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1871)
Sanborn v. Fellows
22 N.H. 473 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1851)
People v. Norton
7 Barb. 477 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Bean v. Quimby
5 N.H. 94 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1829)
Cunningham v. Bucklin
8 Cow. 178 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)