M'Donough v. Fost

14 La. 350
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 15, 1840
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 La. 350 (M'Donough v. Fost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M'Donough v. Fost, 14 La. 350 (La. 1840).

Opinion

Martin, J.,

delivered the opinion-of the court.

This is an application for a mandamus to the judge of the first judicial district, to grant to the defendant an appeal from his order at chambers, for the issue of a writ of seizure and sale. The sole question before us is, whether the defendant is entitled to such appeal.

As early as the year 1823, in the case of Tilghman vs. Dias, 12 Martin, 691, we held that an order of seizure and sale was a judgment. Afterwards, in the case of Gurlie et al. vs. Coquet, 3 Martin, N. S., 498, this principle was recognized, and we added that such a judgment was final in its nature, and that an appeal lies therefrom. We have acted on such appeals in the cases of Moss vs. Byrnes, 12 Louisiana Reports, 615, and Armstrong vs. Levy et al, 14 Idem, 157. The mandamus must therefore be issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Landry v. Victor
30 La. 1041 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1878)
Bank of Tennessee v. McKee
2 La. Ann. 461 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1847)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 La. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mdonough-v-fost-la-1840.