M'Donogh v. Rogers

6 Mart. (N.S.) 212
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 15, 1827
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Mart. (N.S.) 212 (M'Donogh v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M'Donogh v. Rogers, 6 Mart. (N.S.) 212 (La. 1827).

Opinion

Marxist, J.

delivered the opinion of the cort. This appeal is taken from the opinion [213]*213of the court directing the plaintiff to answer ° 1 certain interrogatories, propounded to him the defendant’s answer. Delay is the injury which the plaintiff may sustain from the error of the judge, after his answer is put in, it will be disregarded if he was improperly ordered to answer, and probably, the final judgment of the cause will be further postponed by the appeal, than by a compliance with the order to answer. The apoeal appears to us premature.

Simon for the plaintiff, Lcsassier, Bowen Sf Garland for the defendant.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that it be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Mart. (N.S.) 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mdonogh-v-rogers-la-1827.