M'Donald v. Hobby
1 Root 154
This text of 1 Root 154 (M'Donald v. Hobby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
M'Donald v. Hobby, 1 Root 154 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
Opinion
The deposition of said Elizabeth was ex-trajudicially and illegally taken, and could never have been admitted as evidence; and her death could not help the matter.
This judgment was affirmed in the Supreme Court of Errors.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sayre v. Sayre
25 N.J.L. 235 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1855)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mdonald-v-hobby-connsuperct-1790.