M'Donald v. Hobby
1 Root 154
Opinion
The deposition of said Elizabeth was ex-trajudicially and illegally taken, and could never have been admitted as evidence; and her death could not help the matter.
This judgment was affirmed in the Supreme Court of Errors.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M'Donald v. Hobby, 1 Root 154 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
1 Root 154 (M'Donald v. Hobby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sayre v. Sayre
25 N.J.L. 235 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1855)