M'Donald v. Fisher

Connecticut Superior Court

M'Donald v. Fisher

1 Kirby 339

DecidedNovember 15, 1787

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 339 (M'Donald v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Donald v. Fisher, 1 Kirby 339 (Colo. Ct. App. 1787).

Pincite

Opinion

[343]*343That this bill of exceptions was unsupportabla by the English authorities, on another ground; for that it ought to have been taken at the trial, and not deferred till afterward; and that no bill of exceptions ought ever to be allowed, unless tendered at the time of trial. — And to this point he cited, 1 Salkeld, 288, Wright v. Sharp; 1 Bacon’s Abrid. 326; — - Buller’s Nisi Prius, tit. Bill of Exceptions.

The plea in abatement adjudged siifficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[343]*343That this bill of exceptions was unsupportabla by the English authorities, on another ground; for that it ought to have been taken at the trial, and not deferred till afterward; and that no bill of exceptions ought ever to be allowed, unless tendered at the time of trial. — And to this point he cited, 1 Salkeld, 288, Wright v. Sharp; 1 Bacon’s Abrid. 326; — - Buller’s Nisi Prius, tit. Bill of Exceptions.

The plea in abatement adjudged siifficient.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Kirby 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mdonald-v-fisher-connsuperct-1787.