M'Donald v. Fisher
1 Kirby 339
Opinion
[343] That this bill of exceptions was unsupportabla by the English authorities, on another ground; for that it ought to have been taken at the trial, and not deferred till afterward; and that no bill of exceptions ought ever to be allowed, unless tendered at the time of trial. — And to this point he cited, 1 Salkeld, 288, Wright v. Sharp; 1 Bacon’s Abrid. 326; — - Buller’s Nisi Prius, tit. Bill of Exceptions.
The plea in abatement adjudged siifficient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M'Donald v. Fisher, 1 Kirby 339 (Colo. Ct. App. 1787).
1 Kirby 339 (M'Donald v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.