M.D.M. v. Department of Children & Families
914 So. 2d 1005, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17210, 2005 WL 2861452
Opinion
We affirm the final judgment terminating the appellant’s parental rights because it is supported by competent, substantial evidence. § 39.802, .806(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005); V.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 813 So.2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). M.A. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 814 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)(failure to visit; express concern for child or pay support warranted termination); In re R.V.F., 437 So.2d 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)(same).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M.D.M. v. Department of Children & Families, 914 So. 2d 1005, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17210, 2005 WL 2861452 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
914 So. 2d 1005 (M.D.M. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Interest of RVF
437 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
MA v. Dept. of Children and Families
814 So. 2d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
VG v. Dept. of Children and Families
813 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)