Mdill's v. Mdill

1 U.S. 63, 1 L. Ed. 38, 1 Dall. 63, 1782 U.S. LEXIS 34
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 1, 1782·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

1 U.S. 63 (1782)
1 Dall. 63

M`DILL'S Lessee
versus
M`DILL.[*]

Supreme Court of United States.

*64 BY THE COURT: — The signing of a Deed is now the material part of the execution; the seal has become a mere form, and a written, or ink seal, as it is called, is good. Any Deed under seal, when proved, is proper to be given in evidence. 6 Mod. 45. And, we are of opinion, that a Deed, the execution of which is sworn to by one witness before a magistrate, who certifies the same, is within the rule. Besides, the last Act of Assembly certainly allows the proof of one witness to be sufficient.[*]

NOTES

[*] This Cause was tried at Lancaster, N.P. on the 18th May 1781, before M`KEAN, C.J. ATLER and EVANS Justices.

[*] See post Hamilton's Lessee versus Galloway. S.P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mdill's v. Mdill, 1 U.S. 63, 1 L. Ed. 38, 1 Dall. 63, 1782 U.S. LEXIS 34 (1782).

1 U.S. 63 (Mdill's v. Mdill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Haugen
58 F. Supp. 436 (E.D. Washington, 1944)
Philip v. Stearns
105 N.W. 467 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)
Commonwealth v. Griffith
19 Mass. 11 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1823)
McDill Lessee v. McDill
1 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1782)