M'Daniels v. Russell

34 Mass. 243
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1835
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Mass. 243 (M'Daniels v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M'Daniels v. Russell, 34 Mass. 243 (Mass. 1835).

Opinion

An order from the captain of a company in the militia, directing the clerk to warn all the following persons belonging to my company,” to attend at a company muster, but naming none of them, was held to be indefinite and insufficient.

Upon a petition of McDaniels for a certiorari to a justice of the peace, by whom M‘Daniels had been fined for neglecting to appear at a muster of a company in the militia, it appeared that the petitioner was warned under an order of the captain, directing the clerk “ to warn all the following persons belonging to my company,” but leaving a blank for the names.

said that the clerk was the only non-commissioned officer in the company, and that he anderstood the order as a direction to warn all the members of the company, and gave notice accordingly ; and where the order is intended to apply to the whole company, it is needless to fill it up with the names. But the Court held the order to be indefinite and insufficient, and granted a writ of certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Mass. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mdaniels-v-russell-mass-1835.