M.D. v. State
This text of 686 So. 2d 769 (M.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M.D., a juvenile, appeals his judgment and disposition in this delinquency case. Finding no error, we affirm his judgment and disposition. However, because the trial court failed to advise M.D. of his right to contest the amount of the lien in favor of the public defender, we strike the lien without prejudice. Andrews v. State, 660 So.2d 394 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accord Houser v. State, 666 So.2d 158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Glenn v. State, 657 So.2d 970 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Ashford v. State, 652 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Burke v. State, 642 So.2d 677 [770]*770(Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also Bull v. State, 548 So.2d 1103 (Fla.1989).
JUDGMENT AND DISPOSITION AFFIRMED; LIEN-STRICKEN.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 So. 2d 769, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 158, 1997 WL 14339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/md-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.