Md.-Nat'l Capital Park & Planning Comm'n v. Am. Humanist Ass'n

Supreme Court

Md.-Nat'l Capital Park & Planning Comm'n v. Am. Humanist Ass'n

139 S. Ct. 951, 203 L. Ed. 2d 130

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 22, 2019

DocketNo. 18–18.

StatusPublished

This text of 139 S. Ct. 951 (Md.-Nat'l Capital Park & Planning Comm'n v. Am. Humanist Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Md.-Nat'l Capital Park & Planning Comm'n v. Am. Humanist Ass'n, 139 S. Ct. 951, 203 L. Ed. 2d 130 (U.S. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. The joint motion of petitioners for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument is granted and the time is divided as follows: 15 minutes for petitioner in No. 18-18, 10 minutes for petitioners in No. 17-1717, 10 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General as amicus curiae, and 35 minutes for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. The joint motion of petitioners for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument is granted and the time is divided as follows: 15 minutes for petitioner in No. 18-18, 10 minutes for petitioners in No. 17-1717, 10 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General as amicus curiae, and 35 minutes for respondents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 S. Ct. 951, 203 L. Ed. 2d 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/md-natl-capital-park-planning-commn-v-am-humanist-assn-scotus-2019.